Brand Comparison
Patanjali vs Closeup
Quantify ownership structure, origin, and control signals in one view.
Derived from documented disclosures and scored consistently.
Indian-owned profile
Patanjali
India ownership score: 99/100
Foreign-owned profile
Closeup
India ownership score: 13/100
Comparison Fit
These brands map as direct alternatives within Oral Care.
Profile match: segment:oral care
Ownership Insight
Patanjali currently shows stronger Indian-linked ownership signals than Closeup.
Score Breakdown
Equity ownership
Patanjali: 100%
Closeup: 0%
Manufacturing presence
Patanjali: 95%
Closeup: 70%
Revenue retention
Patanjali: 90%
Closeup: 60%
Strategic control
Patanjali: 100%
Closeup: 0%
Side-by-side Details
| Feature | Patanjali | Closeup |
|---|---|---|
| Country of origin | India | United Kingdom |
| Headquarters | Haridwar | London |
| Founded | 2006 | 1967 |
| Parent company | Patanjali Ayurved | Hindustan Unilever |
| Parent company country | India | United Kingdom |
| Manufacturing in India | 95% | 70% |
| Revenue retained in India | 90% | 60% |
| Ownership type | Indian Private Company | Foreign Multinational |
| Strategic control | India | United Kingdom |
More comparisons in Oral Care
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Patanjali Indian-owned?
Patanjali is Indian-owned.
Is Closeup Indian-owned?
Closeup is foreign-controlled.