Brand Comparison
Horlicks vs Boost
Quantify ownership structure, origin, and control signals in one view.
Derived from documented disclosures and scored consistently.
Foreign-owned profile
Horlicks
India ownership score: 13/100
Foreign-owned profile
Boost
India ownership score: 23/100
Comparison Fit
These brands map as direct alternatives within Health Drinks.
Profile match: segment:health drinks
Ownership Insight
Both brands map to a similar ownership orientation.
Score Breakdown
Equity ownership
Horlicks: 0%
Boost: 0%
Manufacturing presence
Horlicks: 70%
Boost: 70%
Revenue retention
Horlicks: 60%
Boost: 60%
Strategic control
Horlicks: 0%
Boost: 0%
Side-by-side Details
| Feature | Horlicks | Boost |
|---|---|---|
| Country of origin | United Kingdom | India |
| Headquarters | London | Mumbai |
| Founded | 1873 | 1975 |
| Parent company | Hindustan Unilever | Unilever |
| Parent company country | United Kingdom | United Kingdom |
| Manufacturing in India | 70% | 70% |
| Revenue retained in India | 60% | 60% |
| Ownership type | Foreign Multinational | Subsidiary of Foreign Company |
| Strategic control | United Kingdom | United Kingdom |
More comparisons in Health Drinks
Indian Competitors
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Horlicks Indian-owned?
Horlicks is foreign-controlled.
Is Boost Indian-owned?
Boost is foreign-controlled.