Brand Comparison
Under Armour vs Reebok
Quantify ownership structure, origin, and control signals in one view.
Derived from documented disclosures and scored consistently.
Foreign-owned profile
Under Armour
India ownership score: 5/100
Foreign-owned profile
Reebok
India ownership score: 5/100
Comparison Fit
These brands map as direct alternatives within Sportswear.
Profile match: segment:sportswear
Ownership Insight
Both brands map to a similar ownership orientation.
Score Breakdown
Equity ownership
Under Armour: 0%
Reebok: 0%
Manufacturing presence
Under Armour: 20%
Reebok: 20%
Revenue retention
Under Armour: 30%
Reebok: 30%
Strategic control
Under Armour: 0%
Reebok: 0%
Side-by-side Details
| Feature | Under Armour | Reebok |
|---|---|---|
| Country of origin | United States | United States |
| Headquarters | Maryland | Boston, Massachusetts |
| Founded | 1996 | 1958 |
| Parent company | Under Armour India | Reebok India |
| Parent company country | United States | United States |
| Manufacturing in India | 20% | 20% |
| Revenue retained in India | 30% | 30% |
| Ownership type | Foreign Company | Foreign Multinational |
| Strategic control | United States | United States |
More comparisons in Sportswear
Indian Competitors
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Under Armour Indian-owned?
Under Armour is foreign-controlled.
Is Reebok Indian-owned?
Reebok is foreign-controlled.