Brand Comparison
Patanjali vs Anchor
Quantify ownership structure, origin, and control signals in one view.
Derived from documented disclosures and scored consistently.
Indian-owned profile
Patanjali
India ownership score: 99/100
Foreign-owned profile
Anchor
India ownership score: 25/100
Comparison Fit
These brands map as direct alternatives within Oral Care.
Profile match: segment:oral care
Ownership Insight
Patanjali currently shows stronger Indian-linked ownership signals than Anchor.
Score Breakdown
Equity ownership
Patanjali: 100%
Anchor: 0%
Manufacturing presence
Patanjali: 95%
Anchor: 20%
Revenue retention
Patanjali: 90%
Anchor: 30%
Strategic control
Patanjali: 100%
Anchor: 0%
Side-by-side Details
| Feature | Patanjali | Anchor |
|---|---|---|
| Country of origin | India | India |
| Headquarters | Haridwar | Mumbai, Maharashtra |
| Founded | 2006 | 1965 |
| Parent company | Patanjali Ayurved | Panasonic India |
| Parent company country | India | Japan |
| Manufacturing in India | 95% | 20% |
| Revenue retained in India | 90% | 30% |
| Ownership type | Indian Private Company | Indian Private Company |
| Strategic control | India | Japan |
More comparisons in Oral Care
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Patanjali Indian-owned?
Patanjali is Indian-owned.
Is Anchor Indian-owned?
Anchor is foreign-controlled.