Brand Comparison
Protinex vs Boost
Quantify ownership structure, origin, and control signals in one view.
Derived from documented disclosures and scored consistently.
Foreign-owned profile
Protinex
India ownership score: 5/100
Foreign-owned profile
Boost
India ownership score: 23/100
Comparison Fit
These brands map as direct alternatives within Health Drinks.
Profile match: segment:health drinks
Ownership Insight
Both brands map to a similar ownership orientation.
Score Breakdown
Equity ownership
Protinex: 0%
Boost: 0%
Manufacturing presence
Protinex: 20%
Boost: 70%
Revenue retention
Protinex: 30%
Boost: 60%
Strategic control
Protinex: 0%
Boost: 0%
Side-by-side Details
| Feature | Protinex | Boost |
|---|---|---|
| Country of origin | France | India |
| Headquarters | Paris | Mumbai |
| Founded | 1958 | 1975 |
| Parent company | Danone India | Unilever |
| Parent company country | France | United Kingdom |
| Manufacturing in India | 20% | 70% |
| Revenue retained in India | 30% | 60% |
| Ownership type | Foreign Multinational | Subsidiary of Foreign Company |
| Strategic control | France | United Kingdom |
More comparisons in Health Drinks
Indian Competitors
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Protinex Indian-owned?
Protinex is foreign-controlled.
Is Boost Indian-owned?
Boost is foreign-controlled.