Brand Comparison
Mamaearth vs Chicco
Quantify ownership structure, origin, and control signals in one view.
Derived from documented disclosures and scored consistently.
Indian-owned profile
Mamaearth
India ownership score: 96/100
Foreign-owned profile
Chicco
India ownership score: 5/100
Comparison Fit
These brands map as direct alternatives within Baby Care.
Profile match: segment:baby care
Ownership Insight
Mamaearth currently shows stronger Indian-linked ownership signals than Chicco.
Score Breakdown
Equity ownership
Mamaearth: 100%
Chicco: 0%
Manufacturing presence
Mamaearth: 80%
Chicco: 20%
Revenue retention
Mamaearth: 80%
Chicco: 30%
Strategic control
Mamaearth: 100%
Chicco: 0%
Side-by-side Details
| Feature | Mamaearth | Chicco |
|---|---|---|
| Country of origin | India | Italy |
| Headquarters | Gurugram, Haryana | Como |
| Founded | 2016 | 1958 |
| Parent company | Honasa Consumer | Artsana India |
| Parent company country | India | Italy |
| Manufacturing in India | 80% | 20% |
| Revenue retained in India | 80% | 30% |
| Ownership type | Indian Public Company | Foreign Multinational |
| Strategic control | India | Italy |
More comparisons in Baby Care
Indian Competitors
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Mamaearth Indian-owned?
Mamaearth is Indian-owned.
Is Chicco Indian-owned?
Chicco is foreign-controlled.