Brand Comparison
Horlicks vs Protinex
Quantify ownership structure, origin, and control signals in one view.
Derived from documented disclosures and scored consistently.
Foreign-owned profile
Horlicks
India ownership score: 13/100
Foreign-owned profile
Protinex
India ownership score: 5/100
Comparison Fit
These brands map as direct alternatives within Health Drinks.
Profile match: segment:health drinks
Ownership Insight
Both brands map to a similar ownership orientation.
Score Breakdown
Equity ownership
Horlicks: 0%
Protinex: 0%
Manufacturing presence
Horlicks: 70%
Protinex: 20%
Revenue retention
Horlicks: 60%
Protinex: 30%
Strategic control
Horlicks: 0%
Protinex: 0%
Side-by-side Details
| Feature | Horlicks | Protinex |
|---|---|---|
| Country of origin | United Kingdom | France |
| Headquarters | London | Paris |
| Founded | 1873 | 1958 |
| Parent company | Hindustan Unilever | Danone India |
| Parent company country | United Kingdom | France |
| Manufacturing in India | 70% | 20% |
| Revenue retained in India | 60% | 30% |
| Ownership type | Foreign Multinational | Foreign Multinational |
| Strategic control | United Kingdom | France |
More comparisons in Health Drinks
Indian Competitors
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Horlicks Indian-owned?
Horlicks is foreign-controlled.
Is Protinex Indian-owned?
Protinex is foreign-controlled.